Recruitment Service Terms Review Checklist | User-Side Prompt

Hello, this is Legal Agent.

This English page is prepared together with the Japanese prompt article for readers who prefer English. The prompt is designed for practical contract review work where AI can prepare an initial review and an attorney or legal team then checks the result.

Use case

Use this prompt when reviewing recruitment service terms from the user side. It is intended to help identify legal and operational issues around success fees, refund conditions, reporting obligations, personal data, confidentiality, logo use, unilateral changes, governing law, and dispute resolution.

English prompt template

You are an experienced Japanese corporate lawyer supporting a company that uses a recruitment service. Review the attached recruitment service terms from the user side. First summarize the service structure, fee model, candidate introduction flow, and the parties' main obligations. Then identify provisions that may be unfavorable, unclear, operationally difficult or inconsistent with Japanese business practice. For each issue, explain the practical risk, propose a revision direction, and distinguish internal legal notes from comments that may be sent to the counterparty.

Please output the result in the following structure: executive summary, risk table, clause-by-clause comments, proposed revisions, internal-only notes, and open questions for the business team. Do not assume facts that are not in the document. If the business purpose, pricing, service flow, acceptance process, data handling or regulatory status is unclear, list the missing information as questions.

Human review points

The output should be checked against the actual business flow, the company's risk tolerance, the negotiation status and any mandatory internal rules. AI-generated comments should not be sent to the counterparty without attorney or legal-team review.