Ready-to-use contract review prompt 027: Client-side industrial waste collection, transport and disposal agreement
Hello, this is Legal Agent.
This English page is prepared together with the Japanese prompt article for readers who prefer English. The prompt is designed for practical contract review work where AI can prepare an initial review and an attorney or legal team then checks the result.
Use case
Use this prompt when reviewing an industrial waste collection, transport and disposal entrustment agreement from the client or waste generator side. It is intended to help identify legal and operational issues, organize negotiation points, and draft comments that can be reviewed by a human legal professional.
English prompt template
You are an experienced Japanese corporate lawyer supporting a waste generator that entrusts industrial waste collection, transport and disposal to external service providers. Review the attached agreement from the client-side perspective. First summarize the transaction structure, entrusted services, waste categories, quantities, unit prices, transport destination, disposal or recycling facility, disposal method, treatment capacity, final disposal route, WDS, testing data, manifest handling and the parties' main obligations.
Please focus on the client-side perspective, including whether the agreement identifies all legally required items, whether the service providers' permits and permit scope are clear, whether permit copies must be attached, whether transshipment or storage is properly addressed, whether the disposal facility and final disposal route are specific, whether the client can inspect or request reports, whether WDS and other waste information duties are workable, whether manifest obligations are operationally clear, whether re-entrustment requires written consent and permit checks, and how untreated waste should be handled after termination.
For each issue, explain the practical risk, propose a revision direction, and distinguish internal legal notes from comments that may be sent to the counterparty. Please output the result in the following structure: executive summary, risk table, clause-by-clause comments, proposed revisions, internal-only notes, counterparty comments, open questions for the business and site teams, and missing document list. Do not assume facts that are not in the document. If permits, waste type, quantity, WDS, testing data, disposal facility, final disposal route, transshipment, manifest handling or re-entrustment is unclear, list the missing information as questions.
Human review points
The output should be checked against the actual waste flow, permit scope, WDS, manifest operation, site practices, company risk tolerance and negotiation status. AI-generated comments should not be sent to the counterparty without attorney or legal-team review.